[Geowanking] The Geography of Jobs

[Josh Livni]

Radius vs Area is interesting for sure, but I think he may have been
pointing out they had 10k vs 100k options for the optimists vs pessimists
amongst us to choose from (or other way round?).
Maybe an interesting psych experiment would be to make maps with different
legend options -- most will notice only one -- and ask people what they
think the map showed :)


 -Josh


On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 8:43 AM, SteveC <steve at asklater.com> wrote:

>
> On 8 May 2009, at 00:49, Michal Migurski wrote:
>
>  On May 7, 2009, at 3:48 PM, Catherine Burton wrote:
>>
>>  Nothing says well-conveyed information like a good map:
>>>
>>> http://tipstrategies.com/archive/geography-of-jobs/
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Ruh-roh:
>>        http://mike.teczno.com/img/jobs-gained-jobs-lost.png
>>
>
> you're pointing out it seems to be radius rather than area based?
>
>
>
>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> michal migurski- mike at stamen.com
>>                415.558.1610
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Geowanking mailing list
>> Geowanking at geowanking.org
>> http://geowanking.org/mailman/listinfo/geowanking_geowanking.org
>>
>>
> Best
>
> Steve
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Geowanking mailing list
> Geowanking at geowanking.org
> http://geowanking.org/mailman/listinfo/geowanking_geowanking.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://geowanking.org/pipermail/geowanking_geowanking.org/attachments/20090508/b95701d5/attachment-0002.html>