[Geowanking] war of the words
Math Heinzel
wheinzel at wisc.edu
Mon May 4 20:43:03 PDT 2009
This is fun!
1000 experts, one year with no vacations, standard 40-hour work week,
less than a thousand data "pieces" per second.
Of course, selected and managed almost certainly means fed into some
processing scheme, not personally examined by eye or ear.
Still...
>
>
> Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 13:08:49 -0700
> From: Andrew Johnson <andrewljohnson at trailbehind.com>
> Subject: Re: [Geowanking] war of the words
> To: P Kishor <punkish at eidesis.org>
> Cc: geowanking at geowanking.org
> Message-ID:
> <623ca9190905041308t70f89107t1fe48b946dc75c16 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>
> I also don't understand the trillions claim.
>
> If 100 experts each curated 1000 pieces of data a day, it would take
> them
> 20,000,000 days to curate 2 trillion pieces of data.
>
> Has WA been in development for longer than I suspect, or am I missing
> something here?
>
> Andrew
> Co-Founder, TrailBehind.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://geowanking.org/pipermail/geowanking_geowanking.org/attachments/20090504/bf607940/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the Geowanking
mailing list