[Geowanking] Flickrs WOE stuff
steve at asklater.com
Thu Nov 6 20:09:08 PST 2008
On 6 Nov 2008, at 19:59, P Kishor wrote:
> So, it could be argued that -- "polygons from either OSM or
> TeleAtlas/NavTeq data; the geocoded photos that were just placed on a
> map... from the map; the polygons from that set of points.. " -- at
> each stage, the successive creation is deriving only the location. The
> location itself is fact and is thus not copyrightable per 17, 102 (b).
No... it's deriving a set of locations, not a single one.
Because if we follow your argument then it would be cool for me to
derive the intersections (locations) and vectors for all the streets
on a map. They're facts too right? Sweat of the brow and database
directive kick in.
Geowanking mailing list
Geowanking at geowanking.org
More information about the Geowanking