[Geowanking] (Probably a silly?) Question about historical Geowanking Digests

[Will King]

No offence was meant. My response was someone trying to help while
driving my car hence the brevity of the message.  I guess it goes back
to your previous post about needing to understand the context behind
the data.



On 7/11/08, stephen white <steve at adam.com.au> wrote:
> On 11/07/2008, at 10:05 PM, rwild at 1-900-870-6235.com wrote:
>> I hate to think of all the knowledge that late-comers to the group
>> have missed
>> over the years.
>
>
> The response from Will King is so painfully "in front of your face"
> that it will probably make you feel silly. Please don't. It is part of
> the problem that the relevant answers cannot be made obvious enough.
>
> Normally this would be another completely useless "don't answer the
> question, question the question!" post from me, however it will
> hopefully make rwild feel a little warmer and happier in this cruel,
> cruel world. :)
>
> --
>    steve at adam.com.au
>
> _______________________________________________
> Geowanking mailing list
> Geowanking at lists.burri.to
> http://lists.burri.to/mailman/listinfo/geowanking
>

-- 
Sent from Google Mail for mobile | mobile.google.com

Will King
+44 (0) 77950 96645